Madras High CourtCRP/1862/2014dismissed as infructuous

Raj v. Ganthimathi

2016-11-11Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11-11-2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(NPD)No.1862 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Raj ... Petitioner vs Ganthimathi ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the fair and decretal order dated 27.02.2014 in RCA No.13 of 2012 passed by the VII Rent Control Appellate Authority, Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the fair and decretal order passed in RCOP No.2195 of 2009 dated 15.09.2011 passed by XII Rent Control Authority, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner : Ms.R. Archana

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition

has become M. DURAISWAMY,J., sr infructuous for the reason that the petitioner had handed over the possession to the respondent/landlord. The learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed.

11.11.2016 sr Index:no website:yes To

1. The VII Rent Control Appellate Authority, Small Causes Court, Chennai

2. The XII Rent Control Authority, Small Causes Court, Chennai.

CRP(NPD)No.1862/2014

http://www.judis.nic.in