Marie Jaya D/O Apurvasamy v. Marie Rose Fleury

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and M.P.No.1 of 2015 1.Marie Jaya 2.Santhana Marie 3.Arokiamarie 4.Durairaj 5.Adaikalanathan @ Anthuvan 6.Marie Therese Roselin @ Hellen 7.Jayaraj

...Petitioners

Versus

1.Marie Rose Fleury 2.Marie Colandai Therese Fleury 3.MarieVictoriya Fleury 4.Chinna Rani Fleury 5.Sandanamarie Alphonse 6.Flomina Susan Mari 7.Amalorpava Mari Lilly (Marie Aroul Fleury (died rep by Lrs D8 to D17) 8.Fleury Lucien 9.Fleury Bertin 10.Bernard Fleury 11.Fleury Jea Marie 12.Fleury Josephine 13.Fleury Michel

14.Fleury Helene 15.Jegaras Marie 16.Alexandra 17.Durai 18.Balaji 19.Samdame 20.Magui 21.Jully 22.Jayanthi 23.Jeanne D Arc Marie 24.Philomene Marie Susai 25.Dhanaselvame Susai 26.Fleury Marie Therese Lilas 27.Fleury Patrick 28.Fleury Stephen 29.Fleury Melane 30.Fleury Kelvin (Respondents 27 to 30 are minors represented by their mother, Mrs.Fleury Marie Therese Lilas 31.L.Arokianathan 32.L.Sundararaj

...Respondents/Defendants

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 05.11.2014 passed in CRP.No. of 2014 in I.A.No.652 of 2011 in I.A.No.820 of 1999 in O.S.No.171 of 1980 on the file of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry and direct the Court below to number the Review Petition and disposed the same in merits by allowing this civil revision petition. ssssss For Petitioners :No Appearance For Respondents :R1 to R19 and R21 to R32-given up R20-Notice served

O R D E R The matter was posted for hearing on 08.04.2022, on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. In order to give an opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was adjourned and posted under the caption "for dismissal" on the 3rd week of April 2022. Today, when the matter was called by 4.00 p.m., there was no representation for the petitioner, in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner, the matter was passed over. Again, the matter was called by 4.44 p.m., again there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 22.04.2022 ub Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order S S.SOUNTHAR , J.

ub and M.P.No.1 of 2015 22.04.2022