Rajaboopathy v. Joseph Raj

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 05.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.454 of 2013 Rajaboopathy ...Appellant/Complainant Vs.

Joseph Raj

...Respondent/Accused

This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the judgment dated 01.04.2013 made in Crl.A.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the learned III Additional District Sessions Judge,(Cuddalore) Viruthachalam in dismissing the conviction and sentence made in judgment dated 08.03.2012 in C.C. No.112 of 2010 on the file of the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr. A.G. Rajan

J U D G M E N T

When the Criminal Appeal was taken up for hearing on 28.09.2018, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was posted on 05.10.2018 under the caption "for disposal".

Even Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the same for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksa-2/rli https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Viruthachalam.

2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli.

3. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.A.G.Rajan, Advocate, S.R.No. 68756 Crl.A.No.454 of 2013 BR(CO) GN(02/11/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/