← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4970/2026disposed of with direction

A.L.Ramasubramanian v. M/S. Metropolitan Transport Corporation

2026-02-17Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

1. A.L.Ramasubramanian

2. K.Varadan

3. A.AnthonyRajkumar

4. C.Kannadasan

5. K. Muniyandi

6. P.Kumar

7. M.Balakrishnan

8. S.Kannadasan

9. S.Loganathan

10. E.Subramaniam

11. V.Krishna Kumar

12. C. Sekar

13. R.Selvam

14. M.Senthil Kumar

15. Hemathiri

16. G.Boopalan

17. G.Balamani

18. D.Sekar

19. . K.Perumal

20. V. Alex

21. C. Nagarajan

22. S.Ravikumar

23. R.Balamurugan

24. M.Rengasamy

25. P.Gopalan

26. John Sebastian

27. N. Rajan Petitioner(s) Vs

1. M/s. Metropolitan Transport Corporation Rep. by its Managing Director, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600002.

2.M/s State Express Transport Corporation Rep By Its Managing Direct, No 2 Pallavan Salai, Chennai 02 Respondent(s) PRAYER;

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writs of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to settle 6 percent interest for the petitioners 1 to 27 herein for the belated settlement of retirement benefits by considering the representation of the petitioner 1 to 27 dated 22.12.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.D.Soundar Raj For Respondent:

Mr.A.Vinothraj

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent herein to settle 6 percent interest for the petitioners 1 to 27 herein for the belated settlement of retirement benefits by considering the representation of the petitioner 1 to 27 dated 22.12.2025.

2. The case of the petitioners is that they were employed in the respondent Transport Corporation and retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation. However, the terminal benefits have been settled to the petitioners belatedly and the interest component has not been paid for the delayed period. In view of the same, the petitioners submitted representations to the respondents on 22.12.2025 to pay interest for the delayed period. Since the said representations were not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Transport Corporation would fairly submit that in view of the similar order passed by this Court in W.P.No.20622 of 2025, they are willing to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the eligible and admissible amount.

4. Heard the learned counsel for both sides.

5. In view of the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of admissible terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of the terminal benefits of the petitioners within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs 17-02-2026 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.M/s. Metropolitan Transport Corporation Rep. by its Managing Director, No.2, PallavanSalai, Chennai 600002.

2.M/s State Express Transport Corproation Rep By Its Managing Direct, No 2 Pallavan Salai Chennai 02

M.DHANDAPANI J.

17-02-2026