Tmt.M.Varalakshmi v. The State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Date: 08.02.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.P.No. 22429 of 2013 M.Varalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector and District Magistrate, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The District Revenue Officer (Special), Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.06.2013 to enhance the compensation for present guideline value fixed by the Government of Tamil Nadu in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R1 & R2

O R D E R

On the last date of hearing the following orders was passed. "When the matter was came up on 10.07.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be posted on 01.08.2018. Even on 01.08.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents had asked for adjournment for one week.

Today, when the matter is came up for hearing, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. In the interest of justice, this matter is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

adjourned to 08.02.2019 under the caption "for dismissal"."

Today also there is no representation by the writ petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for Nonprosecution. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Pkn To 1.The District Collector and District Magistrate, State of Tamil Nadu, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

2.The District Revenue Officer (Special), Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

W.P.No. 22429 of 2013 vd(co) nr 19/03/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/