R.Sengottian v. R.Chinnasamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA CRP(NPD).Nos.3018 of 2012 and 2411 of 2013 and MP.Nos.1 of 2012 & 1 of 2013

1. R.Sengottian

2. R.Palanisamy

3. C.Kauppanna Gounder

4. R.Rathinam

5. M.Subbathal

6. N.Jayammal ... Petitioners in both CRPs vs.

1. R.Chinnasamy

2. R.Arunachalam

3. M.R.Shanmugam

4. P.Thangavel

5. Palaniappan @ K.Palanisamy ... Respondents in both CRPs

6. The Varadharaja Perumal Temple, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Kongalamman Temple, Erode.

... Respondent in CRP.No. 2411 of 2013

COMMON PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated 14.06.2012 passed in I.A.Nos. 994 of 2011 and 787 of 2012 in A.S.No. 77 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode.

For Petitioners : Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi (in CRP.No.3018 of 2012) Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi (in CRP.No.2411 of 2013) For Respondents : Mr.V.S.Kesavan for R3 to R5 No appearance for R1 & R2 (in CRP.No.3018 of 2012) Mr.V.S.Kesavan for R2, R3 & R5 No appearance for R1, R4, R6 (in CRP.No.2411 of 2013) C O M M O N O R D E R It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the appeal in AS.No.77 of 2011 on the file of the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode has already been disposed of.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.

18.06.2019 mbi Index : Yes/No To The learned I Addl. Subordinate Judge, Erode.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

mbi CRP(NPD).Nos.3018 of 2012 and 2411 of 2013 and MP.Nos.1 of 2012 & 1 of 2013 18.06.2019