Shanmuga Sundararaj v. The Inspector Of Police (Crime

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP.No.11803 of 2016 Shanmuga Sundararaj

...Petitioner

Vs State: The Inspector of Police (Crime) E-3, Teynampet Police Station, Chennai.

...Respondent

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondent police that "Not to harass" the petitioner.

For Petitioner :Mr.N.A.Kareem For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent police "Not to harass" the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. On a complaint given by one Muthaiyan, petition enquiry is pending. Under such circumstances, blanket order of 'not to harass' cannot be passed. The petitioner shall cooperate for the enquiry and during the course of enquiry, he shall not be harassed. However, if any cognizable offence is made out, this order would not be a shield against the arrest of the accused.

With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sms https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Inspector of Police (Crime) E-3, Teynampet Police Station, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to Mr.N.A. Kareem, Advocate SR.30792 Crl.OP.No.11803 of 2016 SKV(CO) EU 16.6.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/