Madras High CourtCRL OP/9878/2018dismissed as infructuous

S.Valli Aged 36 Yrs v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2020-09-07Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.09.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.9878 of 2018 S.Valli .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvanamalai District, Tiruvanamalai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tiruvanamalai East Police Station, Tiruvanamalai.

.. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent police to give police protection to the petitioner and her family and the Lord Srinivasa Perumal Temple situated at Keezhnachipatti Village, Tiruvanamalai Taluk. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This case is taken up through video conferencing. 2.

When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner's husband Subramani had collected a lot of money from various persons and had absconded and in order to cover up his misdeeds, the petitioner has filed the present petition. 3.

However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous due to efflux of time.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

In view of the above, this criminal original petition is closed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nsd To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvanamalai District, Tiruvanamalai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tiruvanamalai East Police Station, Tiruvanamalai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104.

Crl.O.P.No.9878 of 2018 VSNII(CO) RMP(06/10/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/