S.Periyasamy v. R.Mayilvel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.R.P Nos.782 to 785 of 2022 and C.M.P Nos.3920, 3922, 3930 & 3932 of 2022 S.Periyasamy
...Petitioner
in C.R.P No.782 of 2022 S.N.Selvaraj
...Petitioner
in C.R.P No.783 of 2022 A.Ashokkumar
...Petitioner
in C.R.P No.784 of 2022 1.Ashokkumar 2.S.N.Selvaraj
...Petitioners
in C.R.P No.785 of 2022 Vs R.Mayilvel
...Respondent
in all the CRP's.
PRAYER in CRP No.782 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode, dated 10.01.2022 in I.A No.5 of 2021 in R.C.O.P No.1 of 2015.
PRAYER in CRP No.783 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of
the Principal District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode, dated 10.01.2022 in I.A No.3 of 2021 in R.C.O.P No.2 of 2015.
PRAYER in CRP No.784 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode, dated 10.01.2022 in I.A No.3 of 2021 in R.C.O.P No.5 of 2015.
PRAYER in CRP No.785 of 2022: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode, dated 10.01.2022 in I.A No.3 of 2021 in R.C.O.P No.6 of 2015.
In all the petitions For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Harish For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh
O R D E R
Mr.K.M.Harish, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that the sister of the respondent filed a suit for partition in O.S No.165 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchengode and thereafter, the said case was transferred to the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Namakkal and the same was dismissed as settled on 05.06.2025. Hence, the prayer sought for in the present civil revision petitions has become infructuous.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent endorsed the said view.
3. In view of the subsequent developments, these four civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed.
26.09.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order uma To The Principal District Munsif Court at Tiruchengode, R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
uma C.R.P Nos.782 to 785 of 2022 & C.M.P Nos.3920, 3922,3930 & 3932 of 2022 26.09.2025