C.Kanaltheepan @ Kanal v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P.No.5013 of 2022 DR. G. JAYACHANDRAN., The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.53 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others had picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and also attacked the defacto complainant with weapons by entering his house and thereby caused injury to him and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has submitted that the petitioner is the named accused in the FIR and also caused injury to the defacto complainant and 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

DR. G. JAYACHANDRAN., Gv/Vv damaged the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Since the petitioner is the named accused in the FIR and overt act is attributed against him for gathering persons and causing damage to the defacto complainant's house and also threatened him with dire consequences, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

03.03.2022 Gv/Vv Crl.O.P.No.5013 of 2022 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis