Venkatesan v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.02.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.Venkatesan 2.Samundeeswari 3.Priyadharshini 4.Murugan 5.Prabhakaran 6.Sugendran 7.Sasikala 8.Atchuthan 9.Magesh 10.Purushothaman 11.Govindharaj
...Petitioners/Accused 1-11
Vs.
State through The Inspector of Police, Manavala Nagar Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
(Crime No.17 of 2025) ...
Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.17 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police.
Page No.1 of 7
For Petitioners :
Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent :
Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioners / Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2) of BNS r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in connection with the case in Crime No.17 of 2025, seek anticipatory bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that due to wordy quarrel in respect of misappropriation of funds by the defacto complainant in the name of running a Women's organization, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and threatened her with dire consequences and assaulted her. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and since the petitioners questioned the defacto complainant about the misappropriation of funds, a false complaint has been Page No.2 of 7
given and that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners and that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He would further submit that a counter complaint has been given against the defacto complainant and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), per contra, would reiterate the case of the prosecution and submit that it is a case of case and counter and that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that no previous cases are pending against the petitioners.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering that there is a case of case and counter, nature of allegations and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and since the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on certain conditions. Page No.3 of 7
7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvallur, on condition that each petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed Page No.4 of 7
and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
12.02.2025 ata To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tiruvallur.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 3.The Inspector of Police, Manavala Nagar Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
Page No.5 of 7
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
ata CRL O.P. No.3453 of 2025 12.02.2025 Page No.6 of 7
Page No.7 of 7