The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner Of Treasuries And Accounts v. G.Saranya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and C.M.P.No.5808 of 2023 1.The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, No.9, Jones Road, Anna Nagar Street, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

2. The Additional Director of Treasuries and Accounts (Administration), Office of the Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Amma Complex 3rd Floor, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

3. The Superintendent of Police (North Region), CBCID, Chennai.

4. The Treasury Officer, District Treasury Office, Thirvallur District, Thiruvallur.

5. The Assistant Treasury Officer, Uthukottai Treasury Office, Thiruvallur District.

... Appellants 1/4

-VsG.Saranya ... Respondent PRAYER : Appeal under Clause XV of Letters Patent against the order dated 22.07.2022 made in W.P.No.18060 of 2022.

For Appellants :

Mr.M.Alagu Gowtham Government Advocate For Respondent :

Mr.V.Elangovan

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) Since this intra Court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the writ Court dated 22.07.2022 in W.P.No.18060 of 2022, under which, the writ Court though had given a direction by way of mandamus directing the appellants to permit the respondent employee to join service as she has been in long absence, the said order seems to have been complied with by permitting the respondent employee to join service and thereafter, as per the earlier disciplinary proceedings which has already been concluded as recorded by the learned Judge in the impugned order itself that the disciplinary proceedings had come to an end by inflicting the punishment of dismissal of service against the respondent employee and therefore, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent employee also would fairly submit that since the dismissal order has 2/4

been issued already against the respondent employee, she would face it in the manner known to law and therefore nothing would survive in this appeal.

2. The said position has not been controverted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the appellants.

3. In that view of the matter as nothing survives in this Writ Appeal, the same is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.S.K., J.) (A.D.M.C., J.) 05.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji 3/4

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

and A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

vji and C.M.P.No.5808 of 2023 05.03.2025 4/4