← Library
Madras High CourtWP/16214/2024dismissed

M/S.Fritz League Private Limited v. Superintendent Of Police

2026-06-02Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN M/s.Fritz League Private Limited Represented By Its Director Mr.Tanu Sharma, Having Registered Office at Plot No.32, KHA, Nos.8 and 10 Sant Shivnath Nagar, Vill-shahpur, Chinhat, Chinhat, Lucknow, Uttarpradesh 22608. ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Superintendent Of Police Cyber Crime Department (CCD-I), Annanagar, Chennai.

2. RBL Bank Represented By Its Branch Manager, SCO 135-136, Madhya Marg, Sector 32D, 9C Sector 9, Chandigarh.

..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking for an issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to de-mark the Lien created in the Bank Account of petitioner's company being the Current Account No.409001983389 IFSC Code: RATN0000202 with the 2nd respondent in pursuant to the complaint vide complaint no.32906230015666 on the file of the 1st respondent.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Saishankar For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for R1 Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu (Crl.Side) Mr.M.s.Murali for R2 for M/s R&P Partners

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to de-mark the Lien created in the Bank Account of petitioner's company being the Current Account No.409001983389 IFSC Code: RATN0000202 with the 2nd respondent in pursuant to the complaint vide complaint no.32906230015666 on the file of the 1st respondent.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned respective counsels appearing for the respondents and perused the documents placed on record.

4. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 1st respondent submits that there are several complaints received as against the account maintained by the petitioner and still the investigation is pending.

5. Upon hearing the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) it is clear that several complaints have been received as against the account maintained by the petitioner and that the investigation is pending, therefore, the 1st respondent had made a request to create lien to the tune of Rs.80,000/- in the current account of the petitioner, which is lying on the file of the 2nd respondent.

6. Therefore, at this stage, lien created in the petitioner's current account cannot be de-marked, since the investigation is pending. Hence the direction sought for in this Writ Petition cannot be considered and the present Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. However, the 1st respondent is directed to complete the investigation on the complaint received from various persons within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of order. In the result, the present Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssd To 1.The Superintendent Of Police Cyber Crime Department (CCD-I), Annanagar, Chennai.

2. RBL Bank Represented By Its Branch Manager, SCO 135-136, Madhya Marg, Sector 32D, 9C Sector 9, Chandigarh.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ssd 02-06-2026