← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4011/2025allowed

E.Umesh Krishna v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

2025-02-14Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

1. E.Umesh Krishna

2. Seenu @ Palagiri Srinivasalu Reddy

3. Lohith @ Nagineni Lohith Sai

4. Karthi @ Kuncha Venkata Sai Karthik ....

Petitioners Vs

1. State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District.

Crime No.225 of 2024.

2. Satish @ Mummineni Satish Kumar ....

Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, too call for the records pertaining to the first information report in Crime No.225 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same based on the compromise arrived at between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Selvakumaraswamy For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.A.Balamurugan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.225 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 133, 351(3) of BNS. 2.

Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3.

A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioners and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4.

Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.225 of 2024 pending on the file of the first respondent. 5.

In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No. 225 of 2024 pending on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

6.

Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 14.02.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Lpp To

1. The Inspector of Police, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

14.02.2025