Krishnasamy v. Baby

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 20.01.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.R.C.No.72 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Krishnasamy ..

Petitioner/Respondent vs.

Baby ..

Respondent/Petitioner Criminal Revision filed under sections 397 (1) and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchengodu in C.M.P.No.10876 of 2013 in M.C.No.19 of 2011 dated 09.12.2013.

For Petitioner :

Mr.V.Rajamohan For Respondent :

Mr.E.C.Ramesh *****

O R D E R

This revision is preferred against the order of learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchengodu, passed in C.M.P.No.10876 of 2013 in M.C.No.19 of 2011 on 09.12.2013.

2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.

3. It is represented by learned counsel for petitioner that there was no representation on his behalf when the Court below has passed a direction, directing payment of interim maintenance in a sum of Rs.1,000/- per month to the respondent, since on the hearing date i.e., on 09.12.2013, advocates had observed a boycott.

4. This Court, taking into consideration the fact that what has been ordered is only by way of interim maintenance and further the sum is a minimal one, would not interfere with the order of Court below.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

In the result, this Criminal Revision stands dismissed. The respondent is directed to pay arrears within a period of four months from today. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

vsm -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchengodu.

2. Do thro the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode. + 1 cc to Mr.N.Mohideen Basha, Advocate, SR 3144 + 1 cc to Mr.E.C.Ramesh, Advocate, SR 3378 kk(co) prk4/3 Crl.R.C.No.72 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/