Jeyaseelan v. Dinesh

C.M.P.No.3509 of 2021 C.M.A(Sr).No.66136 of 2020 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

The 1st respondent remained exparte before the Tribunal. Hence, notice to him is dispensed with.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned.

4. It is made clear that petitioner/claimant is not entitled to claim any interest for the delay period.

3. Registry is directed to print the name of M/s.R.Rathna Thara, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent at the time of admission.

nr 07.03.2025 Note:Registry is directed to number the CMA and list it for admission, if it is otherwise in order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis