D.Perumal, v. The Branch Manager,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.23248 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 (Heard through VC) D.Perumal ... Petitioner vs The Branch Manager, Bank of India, Mogappair East Branch, Chennai 600 037.

...Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to sanction the Educational Loan Rs.3,54,350/- as requested by him on 10.8.2013.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondent :

Mr.S.Sathiyanarayanan

ORDER

The Writ Petition is taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing mode on account of COVID-19 pandemic situation.

2. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent to sanction educational Loan to the tune of Rs.3,54,350/-, as requested by him on 10.8.2013. 3.

The academic year commenced in the year 2013 and ended in the year 2017, by which time, the student, for whom the financial assistance was sought for, would have completed the course.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondentBank also stated that the loan was not sanctioned, as the student has secured the seat not through counselling, but through the management quota.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.

As the course itself is completed, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Hence, the same is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gp(co) krd 29/10 W.P.No.23248 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/