N.A.Gopal v. Jaisankar Babu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:22-2-2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Cont.P.No.1150 of 2015 N.A.Gopal ... Petitioner

Versus

1.Jaisankar Babu, S/o.Kannaiya Naidu, The Director, Tiruttani Agricultural Cooperative Society, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Chairman, Kanchipuram Central Cooperative Bank, Kanchipuram Post, Kanchipuram District.

(2nd respondent is suo motu impleaded as per order dated 15.6.2015 in Cont.Pet.No.1150/2015) 3.The Cooperative Sub Registrar, (Execution & Liquidation) Ammayarkuppam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District.

(3rd respondent is suo motu impleaded as per the order dated 20.7.2015 in Cont.Pet.No.1150/2015) ... Respondents This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Court in W.P.No.24982 of 2013 passed on 24.9.2013.

For Petitioner :Mr.Chokkalingam For Respondents :Mrs.T.P.Savitha for RR 1 & 3 Mrs.G.Thilagavathi for R2

ORDER

The contempt petition has been filed for violation of the orders dated 24.09.2013 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24982 of 2013, by which, this Court directed the second respondent therein to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 15.10.2012 seeking retirement and service benefits.

2.

When notice was ordered to the respondent, it was informed by Mrs.T.P.Savitha, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and Mrs.Thilagathi, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent that the second respondent Cooperative Society has been liquidated and it is under the administration of Cooperative Sub-Registrar (Liquidation). Therefore, this Court, suo motu impleaded the said Sub-Registrar as third respondent.

3.

Mrs.T.P.Savitha, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent also takes notice on behalf of the third respondent.

4.

Taking into consideration of the affairs of the first respondent, it is for the third respondent to settle the claim of the petitioner. In view of that the petitioner is directed to make his claim petition to the third respondent and on such receipt of the claim petition, the third respondent shall hear the petitioner and adjudicate the claim within four weeks from the date of the receipt of

the claim petition.

5.

With the above direction, the contempt petition is closed. No costs.

SD/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR(OS) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2016. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

RLD/CO/10/03/2016 One CC to Government Pleader, SR.2320 One CC to M/s.G.Thilakavathi, ADvocate, SR.2393 One CC to M/s.T.P.Savitha, Advocate, SR.2462 One CC to Mr.C.Chokkalingam, Advocate, SR.2282 To 1.Jaisankar Babu, S/o.Kannaiya Naidu, The Director, Tiruttani Agricultural Cooperative Society, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Chairman, Kanchipuram Central Cooperative Bank, Kanchipuram Post, Kanchipuram District.

(2nd respondent is suo motu impleaded as per order dated 15.6.2015 in Cont.Pet.No.1150/2015) 3.The Cooperative Sub Registrar, (Execution & Liquidation) Ammayarkuppam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District.

(3rd respondent is suo motu impleaded as per the order dated 20.7.2015 in Cont.Pet.No.1150/2015)