Sugendran v. Srinivasan (Died)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 1.Sugendran 2.Vijayalakshmi 3.Rajendiran 4.Bagyalakshmi 5.Ravichandran 6.Sumathi

...Petitioners

Vs.

Srinivasan (Died) 1.Radhakrishnan 2.Lakshmi Devi 3.Pradeepa 4.Urmila 5.Chandra 6.Shanthi 7.Vijayabalan 8.Ramachandran 9.Raja 10.Ashok 11.Vijaya 12.Geetha 13.Guruprasad 14.Kesava Rajasekaran @ Kesavan ...Respondents 1/4

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the District Munsif Court, Perambalur, dated 31.10.2014 in I.A.No.53 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2007.

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Valliappan For Respondents : Mr.Balu Rangasamy Associates for R14 : R1 to R13 - No Appearance

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the dismissal of the application in I.A.No.53 of 2012 in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Perambalur, dated 31.10.2014.

2. The respondents 1 to 13 herein have filed R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif) Perambalur, against the 14th respondent herein for eviction of the tenant premises. During pendency of the said RCOP, the respondents 1 to 13 herein have filed an application in I.A.No.53 of 2012 stating that during pendency of the said RCOP they have sold the tenanted premises to the petitioners herein under a registered sale 2/4

deed dated 16.12.2011 and hence, they should be substituted as the petitioners in R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2007. The learned Rent Controller (District Munsif), Permabalur, by the order dated 31.10.2014 has dismissed the said petition holding that the petitioners herein may be added as respondents in the RCOP but, they cannot he added as petitioners by substituting the original petitioners. Feeling aggrieved, the said proposed parties have filed the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. When the petition came up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the 14th respondent/tenant has submitted that the 14th respondent has vacated the premises and handed over the possession to the original landlords and hence, nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the Court may record the submission of the learned counsel for the 14th respondent and close the Civil Revision Petition. 3/4

P.RAJAMANICKAM, J.

dna

5. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

06.10.2020 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order dna To The learned District Munsif Court, Perambalur. C.R.P.(PD).No.2430 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 4/4