Union Of India Rep. By v. The Registrar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.12.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN 1.Union of India Rep. by The Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi 110 001.

2.The General Manager, Integral Coach Factory, Chennai - 600 038.

3.The Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officer, Integral Coach Factory, Chennai - 600 038.

.... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai - 600 104.

2.Mr.L.Dayanidhi 3.Mr.T.Govardanan 4.Mr.J.Ramesh Packairaj 5.Mr.R.Sudhakar Reddy 6.Mr.S.Mohan Ranjan

7.Mr.Suman Madan 8.Ms.R.Valarmati 9.Ms.J.Jayanthi 10.Ms.Usha Gopalakrishnan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent/Tribunal in O.A.No.310/1620/2015 on 11.09.2018 and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Vijay Anand Standing Counsel for Railways For R1 : Tribunal For R2 to R10 : Ms.S.Kala

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Writ on hand has been instituted challenging the order dated 11.09.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, in O.A.No.310/1620 of 2015.

2.The Tribunal directed the writ petitioners/respondents in O.A.No.310/1620 of 2015 to consider the relief sought for by the respondents/applicants in O.A.No.310/1620 of 2015, in the light of the orders of the Madras High Court in W.P.Nos.18611 & 18612/2011.

3.The issue relating to stepping up of pay on par with the juniors was decided by the Karnataka Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court of Karnataka. However, SLP (Civil) Diary No(s).5973 of 2018 was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the Apex Court granted stay of operation of the judgment passed by the High Court of Karnataka. Similarly, other matters are also pending and the Apex Court tagged those matters along with SLP (C) No.21803 of 2014. Since similar issues are pending before the Supreme Court of India, the directions issued by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, in the impugned order cannot be implemented by the petitioner department.

However, after disposal of the appeals by the Supreme Court of India, all necessary actions are directed to be taken by the petitioner department with reference to the grievances of the respondents/employees. 4.Till the disposal of the cases by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the impugned order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dated 11.09.2018, in O.A.No.310/1620/2015, is kept in abeyance and after disposal of the appeals pending before the Apex Court, it can be acted upon.

5.Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs. [S.M.S., J.] [M.J.R., J.] 04.12.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sli To The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai - 600 104.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

sli 04.12.2024