V.Balasundaram v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WMP Nos. 11597 of 2025 AND 11601 of 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.Nos.169894 and 169781 of 2024 WMP No.11597 of 2025
1. V.Balasundaram
2. T.Marane Parthibane
3. G.Krishnamuthy
4. V.Sundara Rajan
5. Bassava Balasubramaniam
6. R. Malaroli
7. K.Lalitha
8. K.Ilango
9. R. Malathy 10.S.Lakshmanan ..Petitioners Vs
1. Union Of India Rep by the Government of Puducherry, Through the Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Puducherry.
2. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry
3. The Chief Secretary To Government, Chief Secretariat, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry
4. Puducherry State Public Works Dept. Work Asst. Asson. affiliated to the Puducherry State Govt. Emp. Central Federation, 65, Amman Koil St, Puducherry rep by Secretary Er.Shunmougam
5. P.Elango Arasan, S/o.K.Ponnaji, working as Work Assistant, Public Works department, Puducherry
6. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai-104 ..Respondent WMP No. 11601 of 2025
1. R.Sakkaravarthy
2. P.Ashok Kumar
3. K. Gunaseelan
4. .Chandrasekar
5. R.Ramesh
6. P. Balasubrmanian
7. K.Sekar
8. K.Meenashi Sundaram
9. P.Balamurugan 10.
M.Joeram ..Petitioner Vs
1. Union Of India Rep by Chief Secretary to Government, Puducherry
2. The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Puducherry.
3. Uma Maheswari
4. G.Perarasi
5. S.Latchoumy
6. The Registrar ..Respondents Prayer in WMP No. 11597 of 2025 : To condone the delay of 2761 days in filing Review Application as against the order dated passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No 5638 of 2017 Prayer in WMP No. 11601 of 2025 :
To condone the delay of 2761 days in filing Review Application as against the order dated passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No 5637 of 2017
For Petitioners :
Mr.L.Chandrakumar for Mr.Prakash Adiapadam For Respondents :
Mr.Syed Mustafa Special Government Pleader (Puducherry) Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) This Court has already granted leave to the petitioner to prefer a review application on the ground that the review petitioner is not a party to the writ petition. It is a third party review application and considering the said fact leave was granted.
2. Thus the delay in filing is neither willful not wanton, but due to lack of knowledge about the order passed in the writ petition. Hence, the delay is condoned and the petitions are ordered. Registry is directed to number the review applications if the papers are otherwise in order. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 11-06-2026 KST
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.
AND N.SENTHILKUMAR J.
KST WMP Nos. 11597 & 11601 OF 2025 in Rev.Aplw.SR.
Nos.169894 and 169781 of 2024 11-06-2026