The Special Tahsildar(Land Acquisition Officer) v. K.Ponnammal

C.M.P.Nos.3474, 3467, 3470, 3471, 3476, 3477 to 3479 & 3484 of 2022 in A.S.No.139, 142, 145, 141, 140, 137, 138, 143 & 144 of 2021 M. DURAISWAMY , J.

and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

[Order of the Court was made by M. DURAISWAMY, J.] Mr.R.Thiyagarajan, learned counsel appearing for the claimants and Mr.Jayesh B. Dolia, learned counsel appearing for the CMRL, have no objection in ordering the petitions. Further, we are satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions. 2.Hence, the petitions are ordered.

i. The document, Reference letter to Valuation Officers, International Taxation-I, Chennai-34, dated 30.12.2011, is marked as Ex.R32.

ii. The document, Letter of Income Tax Department, Valuation Cell, Chennai - 600 006, dated 06.08.2012, is marked as Ex.R33. iii. The document, Certificate of Encumbrance on Property, dated 07.08.2012, is marked as Ex.R34.

iv. The document, Valuation Report by Valuation Cell, Income Tax Department, Chennai - 600 006, dated 29.01.2013, is marked as Ex.R35.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M. DURAISWAMY , J.

and T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

mkn v. The document, Letter sent on behalf of claimants to Income Tax Department, Chennai - 600 006, dated 04.03.2013, is marked as Ex.R36. vi. The document, Letter from DRO to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, dated 22.06.2021, is marked as Ex.R37. 3.Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram, learned Advocate General appearing for the petitioner/appellant, Mr.R.Thiyagarajan, learned counsel appearing for the claimants and Mr.Jayesh B. Dolia, learned counsel appearing for the CMRL, submitted that there is no necessity for remitting the matter to the Reference Court for adducing any oral evidence.

(M.D., J.) (T.V.T.S., J.) 29.03.2022 mkn C.M.P.Nos.3474, 3467, 3470, 3471, 3476, 3477 to 3479 & 3484 of 2022 in A.S.No.139, 142, 145, 141, 140, 137, 138, 143 & 144 of 2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis