← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/3626/2023granted

Mrs.Suji @ Susila v. Sub Inspector

2023-02-28Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi6 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2) (a), 4 (1), 4(2) (a), 4(2)(b), 4 (2) (c), 5(1)(a), 5(1)(b), 5(1)(c), 5(1)(d), 7(1)(a) and 5B(1) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956, in Crime No.461 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that based on the discreet information that there is a brothel conducted in the house of the petitioner situated at Anjaneyapuram, Kakkalur, Tiruvallur District, conducted raid on 17.12.2022 at about 5 a.m., and found that the petitioner had engaged some victim girls in brothel fixing the rate as Rs.1,000/- per day, the men who present were escaped and victims were secured, accused Sankar Ganesh was arrested, and based on the complaint FIR was registered. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is an innocent person and she is the owner of the house. He would submit that without her knowledge the alleged crime committed. He would further submit that without prejudice to his contentions, the petitioner is prepared to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards any charitable organization or association. Therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that based on the discreet information that there is a brothel conducted in the house of the petitioner situated at Anjaneyapuram, Kakkalur, Tiruvallur District, conducted raid on 17.12.2022 at about 5 a.m., and found that the petitioner had engaged some victim girls in brothel fixing the rate as Rs.1,000/- per day, the men who present were escaped and victims were secured, accused Sankar Ganesh was arrested, and based on the complaint FIR was registered. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned Counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions; 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) to the Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Ponneri and on such receipt and receipt of proof of payment, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.1, Thiruvallur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to

the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police station on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of six weeks;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

28.02.2023 gbi

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

gbi 28.02.2023