Patric David v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.2660 of 2025 Patric David ... Petitioner Vs

1. State rep. by Inspector of Police, W5, All Women Police Station, Vepery, Chennai.

Crime No. 8/2024

2. F.Anitha ... Respondents Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the records relating in Cr.No.8 of 2024 dated 13.12.2024 on the file of the 1st respondent police herein.

For Petitioner : Mr.Vedavallikumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (for R1) 1/7

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report registered in Crime No.8 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent for the offence punishable under Section 494 of the IPC.

2. The petitioner is the husband of the second respondent. After their marriage, they got separated due to various allegations. The petitioner filed a petition for divorce in O.P. No. 1642 of 2014 before the VII Additional Family Court, Chennai and it is pending. In the meanwhile, the second respondent lodged a complaint against the petitioner and the same was registered for the offences under Sections 498-A, 406, and 506(ii) of IPC. After completion of the investigation, the final report was taken cognizance of in C.C. No. 2628 of 2015 on the file of XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal and it is pending. Thereafter, the second respondent filed another private complaint and filed a petition in Crl. M.P. No. 580 of 2024 before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court and the learned Magistrate issued a direction under 2/7

Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. On the direction, the first respondent registered the First Information Report for the offence punishable under Section 494 of IPC. The offence under Section 494 of IPC is a noncognizable and bailable offence. Further, the learned Magistrate mechanically directed the first respondent to register the First Information Report against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that already the petitioner had been imposed punishment for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, and 506(ii) of IPC. Thereafter, he got married to another lady and committed an offence under Section 494 of IPC.

4. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. Admittedly, the offence under Section 494 of IPC is a noncognizable offence and a bailable one. Therefore, the first respondent has no 3/7

jurisdiction to register any case against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 494 of IPC. Further, it is relevant to extract the provision under Section 198(1) of Cr.P.C as follows:-

198. Prosecution for offences against marriage.__(1)No Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Chapter XX of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) except upon a complaint made by some person aggrieved by the offence :Provided that - (a)where such person is under the age of eighteen years, or is an idiot or a lunatic, or is from sickness or infirmity unable to make a complaint, or is a woman who, according to the local customs and manners, ought not to be compelled to appear in public, some other person may, with the leave of the Court, make a complaint on his or her behalf;

(b) where such person is the husband and he is serving in any of the Armed Forces of the Union under conditions which are certified by his Commanding Officer as precluding him from obtaining leave of absence to enable him to make a complaint in person, some other person authorised by the husband in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4) may make a complaint on his behalf;

4/7

(c) where the person aggrieved by an offence punishable under [section 494 or 495] of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is the wife, complaint may be made on her behalf by her father, mother, brother, sister, son or daughter or by her father's or mother's brother or sister or, [with the leave of the Court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.] Accordingly, no Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Chapter XX of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), except upon a complaint made by some person aggrieved by the offence.

6. Therefore, the first respondent has no jurisdiction to register any First Information Report for a non-cognizable offence without any prior permission or direction from the concerned Jurisdictional Magistrate.

7. In view of the above, the impugned First Information Report cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed. Therefore, the FIR in Crime No.8 of 2024, dated 13.12.2024, on the file of the first respondent herein is hereby quashed. However, the second respondent is at liberty to lodge a private complaint against the petitioner in the manner known to law, if she is so advised.

5/7

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17.02.2025 Index:Yes/No kv To The Inspector of Police, W5, All Women Police Station, Vepery, Chennai.

6/7

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

kv 17.02.2025 7/7