Krishnan v. State By

Crl.O.P.No.4992 of 2022 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN.,J The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 & 506 (ii) of IPC, in Crime No.542 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that the petitioner herein has brutally attacked his wife thereby causing severe injury to her and also absconded. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The petitioner herein had brutally attacked his wife and forced her to part away the land given to her by her mother. The defacto complainant has sustained severe injury. After causing injury, the petitioner herein is absconding. This Court is of the 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN.,J Gv/Vv view that if the petitioner is at large, he may either endanger the life of the defacto complainant or tamper the evidence.

5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03.03.2022 Gv/Vv Crl.O.P.No.4992 of 2022 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis