Shamsath Begam v. R.Venkatesan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 31.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.R.C.No.172 of 2013 Shamsath Begum

...Petitioner

Vs.

R.Venkatesan ... Respondent Prayer:

The Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 12.12.2012 made in Crl.M.P.No.1770 of 2012 in Crl.Appeal.No.38 of 2012 by the learned Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Rameshvel For Respondent : Mr.V.Nicholas

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the main appeal itself had already been disposed by the Court below and hence nothing survives in this revision and the same may be dismissed as infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cgi To The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri.

+1cc to Mr.V.Nicholas, Advocate, S.R.No.75388 Crl.R.C.No.172 of 2013 SS(CO) rrs 16/11/218 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/