← Library
Madras High CourtCRL A/580/2025dismissed

J.Pushpa v. The State Of Tamil Nadu Through The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

2025-06-11Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 11.06.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN J.Pushpa .....

Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Sub-Division, Krishnagiri District - 635 107.

.....

Respondent Prayer:

Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Amendment) Act, praying to set aside the order in Crl.M.P.No.2054 of 2024 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, dated 12.06.2024. For Appellant : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr. S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

This Criminal Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 12.06.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2054 of 2024 by the Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, thereby dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner as against the closure report filed by the respondent in Crime No.361 of 2023.

1/4

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

3. Initially, based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.361 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 468, 470, 471, 472, 417, 463 and 464 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(f), 3(1)(g) and 4 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Amendment) Act, 2015. After completion of the investigation, the respondent closed the FIR as "Further Action Dropped". Pursuant to the filing of the closure report, the petitioner was served with a Referred Charge Sheet notice. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed a protest petition, which was dismissed after a detailed enquiry.

4. A perusal of the closure report, as well as the order dated 12.06.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2054 of 2024 by the Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, reveals that the entire allegations are civil in nature and no cognizable offence is made out warranting the filing of a final report. That apart, the petitioner failed to initiate appropriate civil proceedings against the counter parties.

2/4

5. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order dated 12.06.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2054 of 2024 by the Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed.

11.06.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Denkanikottai Sub-Division, Krishnagiri District - 635 107.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Lpp 3/4

11.06.2025 4/4