T.Suresh, Aged 34 Years, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Second day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr. Justice P. DEVADASS CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3764 of 2017 T.SURESH, [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU [ RESPONDENT ] REP. BY, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS, POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017.

For Petitioner : M/S.A.B.FATHIMA SULTHANA Advocate For Respondent : MR.R.SEKAR, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petition for anticipatory bail in unknown Crime Number of 2017 for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC. 2.Heard both sides.

3.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there is no case and no petition enquiry is pending as against the petitioner.

4.Thus, there is no case, no complaint and no FIR as on today as against the petitioner with the respondent police. 5.The above submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that there is no case, no complaint is pending as against the petitioner is recorded and accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

-sd/- 02/03/2017 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS, POONAMALLEE POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.A.B.FATHIMA SULTHANA Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.3764/2017 Date :02/03/2017 RD 07/03/2017