← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3547/2011disposed of

M/S.Rathinam Arumugam, v. The Inspector General Of

2019-01-24Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.01.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.3547 of 2011 & M.P. No.1 of 2011 & W.M.P. No.1164 of 2019 M/s.Rathinam Arumugam ...Petitioner/Petitioner -Vs1.Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Coimbatore. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 30.06.2010 in Pa.Mu.No.48071/P1/2009 and the consequential order of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.7510/g1/2010 dated July 2010 and to quash the same and direct the second respondent to grant stamp duty exemption and register the document No.P275/08. For Petitioner : Mrs. Amirta Dinakaran For Respondents : Mr.P.P. Purushothaman, G.A.

****

O R D E R

According to the petitioner, the petitioner has presented a settlement deed on 30.12.2008 for registration before the second respondent. The second respondent assigned Doc.No.P275/2008 on the file of the second respondent and the same was kept pending for the reason best known to the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the aforesaid prayer.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice to return the unregistered Document No.P275 of 2008 filed by the petitioner as settlement deed before the second respondent on 30.12.2008, as sought for in the amendment application filed by the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that they are not opposing the prayer sought for in the amendment application to return the unregistered Document No.P275 of 2008 filed as settlement deed, before the second respondent on 30.12.2008.

4. In the light of the submission made by the parties, this Court is inclined to direct the second respondent to return the original Document No.P275 of 2008 presented by the petitioner as settlement deed, to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vaan To 1.Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Coimbatore.

+1cc to Mr.R.Parthiban, Advocate, S.R.No.5458 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6478 W.P.No.3547 of 2011 & M.P. No.1 of 2011 & W.M.P. No.1164 of 2019 SR(CO) rrs 18/02/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/