Suresh Kumar @ Suresh @ Johny Bai v. State Rep By

Crl.O.P. No.5009 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.5009 of 2022 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 452, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.136 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a quarrel in between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. It is also alleged that the petitioners attacked and threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the prosecution is totally false and the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P. No.5009 of 2022 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

Sma/rgm 4.Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner which has been committed in a public place which has caused disturbance to the defacto complainant and the general public, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 04.03.2022 Crl.O.P.No.5009 of 2022 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis