M/S.Cholamandalam Investment v. Mr.Susanto Prasad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :04.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER Application No.3313 of 2016 Mr. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited 'Dare House', No.2, N.S.C.Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai - 600 001 .... Applicant ..Vs..

Mr. Susanto Prasad .... Respondent Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9 (ii) (a) (b) (c) & (e) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an Advocate Commisioner to seize and deliver the vehicle to the applicant, which is morefully described in the schedule to the Judges summons, which is lying in the custody of respondent. For applicant : Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar

O R D E R

1. Learned counsel for the applicant says that, as directed by this Court, paper publication has been carried out. 1.1. For this purpose, he relies upon the affidavit filed in that behalf.

1.2. In these circumstances, counsel for the applicant prays for closure of the application.

2. It appears that, despite service, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent.

3. To be noted, in the previous order, it was noted that the subject vehicle had already been seized and handed over to the applicant.

4.

I am informed that an Award has been passed on 10.09.2014, in respect of the dispute obtaining between the parties.

5. Therefore, as prayed, the application is closed, leaving the parties to take recourse to an appropriate remedy, in accordance with law.

ga 04.11.2016

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

ga Application No.3313 of 2016 04.11.2016

http://www.judis.nic.in