Madras High CourtWP/3830/2011dismissed as infructuous

N.Rajendran v. The District Superintendent

2019-02-04Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:04.02.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.3830 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 N.Rajendran .. Petitioner vs.

1.The District Superintendent of Police, Erode District.

2.Mr.Jaganathan ..Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to take appropriate departmental action against the 2nd respondent in view of the complaint dated 11.11.2010 given by the petitioner under Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955 and other appropriate Rules and regulations.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh,A.G.P.for R1 R2 No appearance

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication. 2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed.

msk Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Superintendent of Police, Erode District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, High Court,Mds,vide S.R.No.9719 W.P.No.3830 of 2011 Kak(14/03/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/