← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/3924/2026dismissed

G.Satish Kumar, v. Christiana Sargunam,

2026-02-13Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

1. G.Satish Kumar, S/o.Gopikrishnan, Represented by his Power of Attorney Holder, G.Vijayalakshmi G-D, Bajaj House, No.4A, Stringers Street, Periamet, Chennai -600 003.

2. G.Vijayalakshmi, W/o.Gopikrishnan, G-D, Bajaj House, No.4A, Stringers Street, Periamet, Chennai -600 003.

..Appellant(s) Vs

1. Christiana Sargunam, W/o.Late Antony Jothi Sargunam, No.21, Anbu Nagar Main Road, Crawford, Trichy -620 012.

2. M/s.Bajaj Enterprises, Rep. by its Proprietor, Srichand K Bajaj, V floor, Haridevi Chambers, No.71/72, Panthenon Road, Egmore, Chennai -600 008.

3. M/s.Bajaj Promoters Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, No.71/72, Haridevi Chambers, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai -600 008.

4. Rajesh S Bajaj, S/o.Srichand K Bajaj, Residing at V Floor, Bajaj House, No.4A, Stringers Street, Periamet, Chennai -600 003.

5. Anuja R Bajaj, W/o.Rajesh S Bajaj, Residing at V Floor, Bajaj House, No.4A, Stringers Street, Periamet, Chennai -600 003.

6. Raj S Bajaj, W/o.Late Srichand K Bajaj, Residing at No.162, Greams Lane, 2nd Floor, Greams Court, Chennai -600 006.

7. Rohith Bajaj, S/o.Late Srichand K Bajaj, Residing at No.162, Greams Lane, 2nd Floor, Greams Court, Chennai -600 006.

8. Rahul Bajaj, S/o.Late Srichand K Bajaj, Residing at No.162, Greams Lane, 2nd Floor, Greams Court, Chennai -600 006.

..Respondent(s) Prayer: To accept the new cause title as shown in the above Civil Revision Petition and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit to pass and thus render justice.

For Appellant(s):

Mr. K.V.Sundararajan

ORDER

It is seen from the typed set of papers that the first petitioner is not represented by the second petitioner, namely Vijayalakshmi before the Trial Court. Therefore, if the first petitioner wants to file the civil revision petition through his power agent, the second petitioner herein, he has to file an appropriate application seeking to recognise the power of attorney. Hence, this petition to accept the cause title is not maintainable.

2. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to file an appropriate application to recognise the power of attorney. 13-02-2026 MST

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

MST CMP No. 3924 of 2026 13-02-2026