S.Zeenathaman v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18/2/2019 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.P.No.4630 of 2019 S. Zeenathaman ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Collector O/o. The District Collector Tindivanam.

2. The Commissioner Tindivanam Municipality Tindivanam.

...

Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to forbear the respondents from in any way altering the nature and usage of lands in respect of the lands at S.No.33/2 Avarapakkam, Tindivanam.

For Petitioner ...

Mr.A.Tamilvanan For respondent ...

Mr.M.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Government Pleader (I.c) - - - - -

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was delivered by S.Manikumar, J) Though the petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus, to forbear the respondents, from in any way altering the nature and usage of lands, in respect of the lands, at S.No.33/2 Avarapakkam, Tindivanam, he has not substantiated that the land in S.No.33/2, Avarapakkam, Tindivanam, has been described as Kuttai, in the revenue records and that reclassification and consequent allotment to the street vendors is bad. When attention of the above was brought to the notice to the learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Permission is granted.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is withdrawn as dismissed.

No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mvs.

To

1. The Collector O/o. The District Collector Tindivanam.

2. The Commissioner Tindivanam Municipality Tindivanam.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 14920 W.P.No.4630 of 2019 A.SK(19/03/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/