T.G.Kothandapani v. The State Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.04.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P. No.10493 of 2015 and M.P. No.1 of 2015 T.G. Kothandapani Petitioner vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu represented by Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009 The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority represented by its Member Secretary No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai 600 008 Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the revised plan filed in No.PPA received in SBC No.1014/2013 and approve the petitioner' revised plan for the building situated in Plot No.74, III Main Road bearing Door No.3/74, Ayyanavaram Village in T.S. No.52/1, Block No.1, Villivakkam Village, Chennai 600 023.

For petitioner Mrs. Selvi George For R1 Mr. N. Sakthivel Government Advocate For R2 Mr. K. Raja Shrinivas Standing Counsel

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.) With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's revised plan filed in No.PPA received in SBC No.1014/2013 and approve his revised plan for the building situated in Plot No.74, III Main Road bearing Door No.3/74, Ayyanavaram Village in T.S. No.52/1, Block No.1, Villivakkam Village, Chennai 600 023.

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent submits that the petitioner's representation dated 03.04.2014 submitted in connection with the approval of revised plan and for removal of lock and seal, will be considered by the second respondent within a period of six weeks.

In view of the above submission made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent, we direct the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's aforestated representation dated 03.04.2014, in accordance with law and on its own merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to state that each and every submission averred by the petitioner in his representation is to be adverted to and a reasoned order is required to be passed. The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction and observation. Costs made easy. Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

cad -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George Chennai 600 009 The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai 600 008 + 1 cc to Mr.K.Raja Shrinivas, Advocate SR 23188 su(co) prk28/4 W.P. No.10493 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/