M/S Sspv Constrction Consortiu v. Vallal Rck Trust
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN Contempt Petition No.1355 of 2016 in A.No.246 of 2013 M/s SSPV Construction Consortium, Rep by its Managing Partner, Mr.K.Srinivas, No.17, Chetiar Agaram Road, Gandhi Nagar, Porur, Chennai - 600 116.
... Petitioner
Versus
1. Vallal RCK Trust, Rep by its Chairman, Mr.Vallal RCK, Vengal Village, Thiruvallur Taluk.
2. Mr.Vallal RCK, S/o Late T.Rangappa Mudhaliar, No.78, Giri Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.
3. Saravanan Sivashankaran, Vice Chairman, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
4. Mrs. Chandrammal Vallal RCK, Managing Trustee, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
5. K.V.P.Bhaskaran, Trust Member, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
6. Dr.Chockalingam, Trust Member, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
7. Mrs. Sagunthala, Trust Member, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
8. Mrs. Thenmozhi Bhaskaran, Trust Member, No.85, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
9. R.Gopinath, Manager / Authorized Signatory, Vallal RCK Trust, No.85,Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.
10. Mata Amritanandamayi Math, Rep by its Authourised Signatory, Brahmachari Abhayamrita Chaitanya, Amritapuri P.O., Kollam, Kerala ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents for wilful violation of the undertaking given by the respondents in the counter affidavit dated 15.03.2013 in application No.246 of 2013, Recorded by this Hon'ble Court in paragraph 12 of the order dated 27.03.2013 in application No.246 of 2013 and thus render justice.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Uma Maheswari Ganesh For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.V.Sajeevkumar
O R D E R
Today, this case is listed under the caption "for withdrawal" based on the letter dated 11.10.2018 submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. The learned counsel for the petitioner also sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, as the matter has been settled. She has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) av //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2018. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
PS/19/11/2018