Raji v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH WP.No.5144 of 2021 Raji

...Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore.

2.

Inspector of Police, Crimes, Neyveli Township Police Station, Neyveli, Cuddalore.

...Respondents

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family persons.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Vishwanth For Respondents : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.Charles, Sub Inspector of Police, Neyveli Township Police Station was present before this Court. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, submitted that neither a case registered nor a petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Recording the same, this petition is closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rli To 1.

The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore.

2.

Inspector of Police, Crimes, Neyveli Township Police Station, Neyveli, Cuddalore.

3.

The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai - 600 104.

+1cc to Mr.S.C.Vishwanth Advocate, S.R.No.14609 WP.No.5144 of 2021 PL(CO) BE(22/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/