Sattamethai Dr. Ambedkar v. Chennai Metropolitan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.11.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR WP.No.4116 of 2011 MP.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2011 Sattamethai Dr.Ambedkar Koyambedu Vaniha Valaaha Viyabarihal Munnetra Sangam, represented by its President N.Selvaraj, Koyambedu, Chennai-92 Petitioner Vs 1.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority represented by its Member Secretary, Chennai-8 2.Market Management Committee, represented by its Chief Administrative Officer, Chennai-92 Respondents Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd Respondent relating to the impugned tender notice No.8/2010-11, dated 18.10.2010, as advertised in the Daily, viz. 'Dinakaran' on 20.10.2010 and connected tender schedules, and to quash the same and consequently to direct the Respondents to renovate the toilets already constructed in the Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, out of their own funds/ arrangements and to let the same for operation and maintenance under one year contract basis by following the earlier practice. For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondents :

Mr.J.Ravindran-R1 Mr.M.Velmurugan-R2

ORDER

This Writ Petition is of the year 2011. On an earlier occasion, when the matter was taken up for consideration by this Court on 1511.2018, there was no representation for the Petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be listed today, i.e. on 16.11.2018 under the caption "for dismissal".

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Even today, i.e. 16.11.2018, when the matter is taken up for consideration, neither the Petitioner is present nor there is any representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Earlier also, there were several adjournments given at the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Further, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Respondents that nothing survives in this Writ Petition for adjudication. Hence, this Court is of the view that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed, for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected MPs are closed.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Srcm 1.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority represented by its Member Secretary, Chennai-8 WP.No.4116 of 2011 ASK(03/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/