← Library
Madras High CourtA/3378/2016closed

Equitas Finance Limited v. Neeraj Kumar Deswal

2016-12-07Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam1 pages

A.No.3378 of 2016 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. Service of notice on the respondents is completed.

The name of the first respondent is printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation for him.

Registry to print the name of the second respondent in the cause list and list on 09.12.2016.

2.

The advocate commissioner appointed in this application seized the vehicle and executed the warrant of commission and also filed a report wherein he sought additional remuneration.

3. Considering the fact that the vehicle was seized at Haryana and the report that the advocate commissioner had spent more than four days for repossessing the vehicle, the advocate commissioner shall be paid an additional remuneration of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only).

The advocate commissioner shall stand discharged.

4. The vehicle shall not be alienated until further orders of this Court or of the Arbitrator.

RS 07.12.2016 http://www.judis.nic.in