Santhoshkumar v. P. Raja

CMP No.3415 of 2025 in CMA SR No.89275 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Ms.I.Malar, learned counsel submits that she filed vakalath for the second respondent. Notice to the 1st respondent already dispensed with.

Court notice was served to the fourth respondent and private notice served to the third respondent. Though the names of the respondents 3 and 4 appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of them. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2nd respondent Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 39 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order. Registry is directed to print the name of Ms.I.Malar, counsel for the 2nd respondent, at the time of admission.

04.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis