Chellammal v. State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN W.A.No.1519 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.12208 of 2018

1. Tmt.Chellammal

2. Tmt.R.Selvaraji

3. Tmt.R.Vijaya

4. Tmt.N.Thangam

5. N.Ravichandran

6. N.Ramesh

7. Tmt.N.Sellam

8. N.Raja

9. Tmt.N.Selvarani 10.Tmt.Thenmozhi .... Appellant vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. By Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2. The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Attur, Salem District.

3. M.Dharmalingam

4. R.Murugesan

5. R.Sundaram

6. D.Sivagananam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P No.10360 of 1995 dated 05.09.2002.

W.P No.10360 of 1995 Writ Petition filed under article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records

pertaining to the order passed by the the Government in G.O.No.3 (D) No.131, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, dated 24.02.1994 and quash the same as far as the Petitioner's concerned.

For Appellant :

Mr.P.Ganesan for Mr.Mani For Respondents :

Mr.N.Manikandan, G.A.

--------

J U D G M E N T

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN,J.] Challenge in this Writ Appeal is to the order of the learned single Judge dated 05.09.2002 made in W.P.No.10360 of 1995, in and by which the Writ Petition filed by the appellant challenging the land acquisition proceedings was dismissed by the learned single Judge.

2. The only point that was raised was that the Section 6 declaration have been made after the statutory period from the date of Section 4(1) Notification. The learned single Judge, on facts, found that Section 6 declaration has been made within the statutory period from the date of Section 4(1) Notification. Apart from that, we are also informed by the learned Government Advocate that the Writ Appeal in W.A.No.3738 of 2002 which arose out of the same acquisition proceedings has been dismissed by the Division Bench on 13.12.2002.

3. In view of the same, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the learned single Judge. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal fails and the same is dismissed. However, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaenous petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. By Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2. The Special Tahsildar (ADW), Attur, Salem District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.49337 W.A.No.1519 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.12208 of 2018 (CO) GSP(10/08/2018)