Ranjithkumar v. The State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.02.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Ranjithkumar ...petitioner Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem city.

(Crime No.113 of 2024)

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.113 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police.

For petitioner : Mr.S.Parthasarathy For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.01.2024 for the offences registered by the respondent Police under Sections 302 and 147 IPC in Crime No.113 of 2024, seeks bail. 1/4

2.The case of the prosecution is that A1 is the younger brother of the deceased. It is stated that A1 and the deceased used to consume alcohol together. On 15.01.2024, A1 and the other accused were playing cricket, when the deceased came there and interfered with that game. This escalated into a quarrel and finally, the deceased was attacked and he died.

3.The overt act attributed as against this petitioner is that he hit the deceased with coconut tree log.

4.Taking all these into consideration and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

2/4

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

22.02.2024 vkr To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem.

2. The Central Prison, Salem.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.

J.

3/4

vkr

3. The Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem city.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 22.02.2024 4/4