J.Vanitha v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :09.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No.5752 of 2021 J.Vanitha ... Petitioner vs.

1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, D-1 Triplicane Crime Police Station, Chennai 600 002.

... Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr. T.Vinoth Kumar For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamad Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3. Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a money dispute, it is for the parties to redress the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the money dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jv To

1. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, D-1 Triplicane Crime Police Station, Chennai 600 002.

+1 cc to Mr.K.Sankar, Advocate Sr.No. 14758 WP No.5752 of 2021 GPL(CO) RMP(31/03/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/