Kaashyap Technologies Ltd v. Nitin Kumar Dhirajlal Gokal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 14/11/2022 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR a n d M.P.Nos.1,1,1 and 2, 3 and 2 of 2011 Kaashyap Technologies Limited rep. By its Authorised Signatory R.Chandrasekar 33/8 C.P.Ramasamy Road, Alwarpet Chennai 600 018.
...
Petitioner in W.P.No.
A. Venkatramani ...
Petitioner in W.P.No.
R. Chandrashekar ...
Petitioner in W.P.No.
Vs
1. Nitin Kumar Dhirajlal Gokal
2. The Metropolitan Magistrate First Class, 33rd Court Ballard Pier, Mumbai.
...
Respondents in all the writ petitions.
PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writs of certiorarified mandamus to call for the Page No:1/4
records of the second respondent relating to the complaint in C.C.No.3305509 of 2010 pending on the file of the second respondent, and consequently, direct the second respondent to return the complaint in the said case to the first respondent for presentation to the appropriate Court having territorial jurisdiction to try and entertain the same. For Petitioners ...
Mr.V.Arunagiri For respondents ...
Mr.Vivek MeNon for Mr.C.Prasanna Venkatesh for R.1 - - - - - C O M M O N O R D E R These writ petitions have been filed praying to call for the records, relating to the complaint in C.C.No.3305509 of 2010 pending on the file of the second respondent, and consequently direct the second respondent to return the complaint to the first respondent for presentation to the appropriate Court.
2. Heard Mr.V.Arunagiri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Vivek Menon, learned counsel for the first respondent. Page No:2/4
3. Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the proceedings initiated before the competent Court at Mumbai are going on. Thus, the cause arose for the purpose of filing the instant writ petitions did not exist and hence, no further adjudication is required.
4. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
14/11/2022 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order mvs.
To
1. The Metropolitan Magistrate First Class, 33rd Court Ballard Pier, Mumbai.
Page No:3/4
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J mvs.
W.P.Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011 14/11/2022 Page No:4/4