Veeran 49 Years, v. The Additional Chief Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.10.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR H.C.P. No.1347 of 2018 Veeran ... Petitioner -Vs1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the order of detention BCDFGISSSV.NO.281/2018 dated, 02/05/2018 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and also to direct the detenu Vimal @ Vimal Raj M/A 23 S/O.Veeran, who is presently detained in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai to be produced before this Hon`ble court and set at liberty.
For Petitioner :
Mr.V.Paarthiban For Respondents:
Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor ***
ORDER
[Order of the Court by C.T.SELVAM, J.] The petitioner, who is the father of the detenu, namely, Vimal @ Vimal Raj, Son of Veeran, age 23 years, challenges the impugned order of detention, dated 02.05.2018 in No.281/BCDFGISSSV/2018 detaining his son as "GOONDA", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of dangerous activities of Boot leggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982).
2. The detenu has come to adverse notice in the following case:- S.No.
Police Station & Crime No.
Section of Law 1.
K1 Sembium Police Station, Crime No.290/2018 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 & 506(ii) IPC 2.
K1 Sembium Police Station, Crime No.294/2018 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 336, 392, 397 & 506(ii) IPC 3.
M1 Madhavaram Police Station Crime No.174/2018 420 & 379 IPC The ground case has been registered against the detenu in Crime No.181/2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, M1 Madhavaram Police Station for offences u/s 341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397 & 506(ii) IPC. The detention order has been passed by Second respondent in No.281/BCDFGISSSV/2018 on 02.05.2018.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.
4. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, confines his argument only in respect of nonapplication of mind on the part of the detaining authority in passing the order of detention.
5. The Grounds of Detention would reveal that 3 adverse cases have been registered against the detenu and a ground case was registered against him in Cr.No.181/2018 for the offences u/s.341, 294(b), 336, 427, 392, 397 & 506(ii) IPC. Admittedly, the detenu has moved bail application in the ground case and the same was dismissed by the learned District Principal and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur, in Crl.M.P.No.1660/2018. Again he has filed another bail application before the District Principal and Sessions Court, Thiruvallur and the same was granted. He has not yet furnished the sufficient sureties. Therefore, the probability of release of the detenu imminently does not arise. Hence, we are inclined to set aside the detention order. Though the detaining authority has made reliance on similar case, in which an accused was granted bail, the facts involved in those cases are different. The principle of similarity cannot be applied mechanically. Normally, bails are granted based on the
facts and circumstances of each case. Therefore, similar case plea, cannot be taken into consideration. Hence, there is no material to substantiate that there is real possibility of the detenue coming out on bail and the said order was passed without application of mind.
6. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in No.281/BCDFGISSSV/2018 dated 02.05.2018, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, namely, Vimal @ Vimal Raj, Son of Veeran, aged about 23 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless her detention is required in connection with any other case. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kmi To:
1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
3.The Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai-66.
4.The Joint Secretary Public (Law and order) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
5.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
H.C.P.No.1347 of 2018 KS(CO) rrs 05/12/2018