Madras High CourtWPMP/34486/2005closed

Indian Bank Employees Union v. Indian Bank Rep.By Its

2021-08-11Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR WPMP.No.34486 of 2005 IN WP.31459 of 2005 1 INDIAN BANK EMPLOYEES UNION [ PETITIONERS ] REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT, NO.25, II LINE BEACH, CHENNAI-01 2 SHOBA MURALIDHARAN Vs 1 INDIAN BANK REP.BY ITS [ RESPONDENTS ] MANAGING DIRECTOR, 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 2 THE GENRAL MANAGER (HRM) INDIAN BANK, HEAD OFFICER, 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to interims Stay of all further proceedings pursuant tot he order No.PRNL/72/2005-06 dated 30.8.05 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the WP.NO.

31459/2005 Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.V.GOVARDHANAN, for M/S.ROW AND REDDY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.RITA CHANDRASEKAR, Learned Counsel of M/S.AIYAR AND DOLIA, Advocate for Respondents, the court made the following order:- Mr.V.Govardhanan, learned counsel of M/s.Row and Reddy (Law Firm) on behalf of two petitioners/writ petitioners and Ms.Rita Chandrasekar learned counsel of M/s.Aiyar and Dolia (Law Firm) on behalf of respondents/respondents are before this Virtual Court.

2. Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of separate proceedings made in main writ petition today which reads as follows:

'Mr.V.Govardhanan, learned counsel of M/s.Row and Reddy (Law Firm) on behalf of two writ petitioners and Ms.Rita Chandrasekar

learned counsel of M/s.Aiyar and Dolia (Law Firm) on behalf of both the respondents are before this Virtual Court.

2. Learned counsel for respondents has refiled (email filed) counter affidavit dated 23.04.2021 and hard copy of the same is before this Court. Learned counsel for respondents says that the pleadings are complete on the side of respondents and she is ready to argue the writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for writ petitioners requests for a short accommodation.

4. List under the same cause list caption 'FINAL HEARING CASES' on 25.08.2021.'

3. From the above, it is clear that the hearing of main writ petition is in the anvil and therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this stay petition pending at this distant point of time.

4. Captioned writ petition is, therefore disposed of as closed without expressing any opinion or view on merits of the matter, leaving open all the questions to be agitated in the main writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. -sd/- 11/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIAN BANK, 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 2 THE GENRAL MANAGER (HRM) INDIAN BANK, HEAD OFFICER, 66, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 Order in WPMP.34486/2005 in WP.31459/2005 Date :11/08/2021 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format DV(18/08/2021)