← Library
Madras High CourtWP/25/2013dismissed as infructuous

T.A.Gunasekar, v. The District Collector,

2022-11-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.25 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 T.A.Gunasekar ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Erode District, Erode - 11.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam - 638 452, Erode District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode - 638 001.

4. The Inspector of Police, Bungalow Pudur Police Station, Erode District.

5. B.Palanisamy

6. M.Chinnusamy ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 herein to enforce the Order of the first respondent made in 1/5

Na.Ka.No.41895/2012/X1 dated 07.12.2012 by giving adequate police protection and to take action against the respondents 5 and 6 who are obstructing petitioner's right to carry on lawful stone quarry operation in S.F.No.227/1 North Part II Vaniputhu Village, Erode District, measuring 3.76.0 hecs. as per the lease Order in Proc.No.19678 / 2010/X1 dated 10.05.2010 issued by the first respondent by considering the representation dated 06.12.2012.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ganesh for N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal, Govt. Advocate - R1 & R2 Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan, Govt. Advocate - R3 & R4 Mr.A.Sundaravadanam - R5 Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy - R6

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 3 and 4 herein to enforce the Order of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No.41895/2012/X1 dated 07.12.2012 by giving adequate police protection and to take action against the respondents 5 and 6 who are obstructing petitioner's right to carry on lawful stone quarry operation in 2/5

S.F.No.227/1 North Part II Vaniputhu Village, Erode District, measuring 3.76.0 hecs. as per the lease Order in Proc.No.19678 / 2010/X1 dated 10.05.2010 issued by the first respondent by considering the representation dated 06.12.2012.

2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition.

3. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 23.11.2022 vrc To,

1. The District Collector, Erode District, Erode - 11.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam - 638 452, Erode District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode - 638 001.

3/5

4. The Inspector of Police, Bungalow Pudur Police Station, Erode District. 4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc 23.11.2022 5/5