Madras High CourtCRL OP/1222/2016dismissed

S.Sasikala v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-01-21Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.01.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.1222 of 2016 S.Sasikala ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, EOW-II, Chennai.

2.R.V.Narmadha 3.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. ... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the first respondent to investigate into complaints in Crime No.88 of 2015 and to file a Final Report now pending on the file of EOW-II and subsequently, direct them to furnish the assets belonging to the second respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Arvind Subramaniam For respondents :

Mr.C.Emalias, Addl.Public Prosecutor, for R.1 and R.3

ORDER

The present criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to investigate the complaint in Crime No.88 of 2015 and to file a Final Report pending on his file and subsequently, direct them to furnish the assets belonging to the second respondent within a time frame fixed by this Court.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that she has preferred a complaint before the first respondent police as https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

against one R.V.Narmadha, the second respondent herein and the complaint given by the petitioner was taken together in Crime No.88 of 2015 which was already pending before EOW-II. But, till date, final report was not filed in the said complaint. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that in respect of the case in Crime No.88 of 2015, this Court has already given direction in various Crl.O.Ps. filed by different victims to expedite the investigation and file final report. Hence, there is no need to give any specific direction in this matter.

4. Since already this Court has given direction to expedite the investigation in Crime No.88 of 2015 and file final report, I am of the opinion, that itself would suffice and there is no need for this Court to give any further direction in this matter.

5. Hence, recording the said submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the criminal original petition is dismissed.

sd/- Assistant Registrar(Cs-V) /TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar sbi To 1.The Inspector of Police, EOW-II, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.1222 of 2016 CO-SR JD 01/02/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/