Mohan v. State Rep By,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.4300 of 2021 MOHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKALUKUNDRAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
CR.NO.27 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S.M.MOHAMED RIYAS Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Section 306 of IPC, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Totally there are 4 accused in this case and the petitioner herein is A1. The allegation is that the deceased said to have illegal intimacy with A1. On 25.01.2021 when the deceased and her husband went to attend a temple festival A1 in this case has forcibly compelled the deceased to come along with him and pulled her. Subsequently A2 to A4 went to the house of the deceased and they have abused her with filthy language. Based on the complaint given by the husband of the deceased a case was registered.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit due to previous enmity between the petitioners and the defacto complainant they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that all the the petitioners went to the house of the deceased and abused her https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
with filthy language. Due to which the deceased has committed suicide. However, he vehemently opposed to grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the F.I.R. Earlier this Court, considering the case on merits, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition in respect of this petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.1885 of 2021 dated 10.02.2021 and granted anticipatory bail to the other accused persons and now there is no change in circumstances. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 08/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUKALUKKUNDRAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKKALUKUNDRAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.M.MOHAMED RIYAS Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.4300/2021 Date :08/03/2021 TA-16/04/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/