Govindasamy, v. Govindammal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.06.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN S.A.No.1077 of 2011

1. Govindasamy

2. Durairaj

3. Vivek ...Appellants Vs.

1. Govindammal

2. Rajamani ... Respondents Prayer:- This Memorandum of Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and decree dated 19.08.2010 passed in A.S.No.2 of 2010 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Dharapuram, confirming the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2009 passed in O.S.No.608 of 2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Dharapuram.

For Appellants :

Mr.A.K.Sridharan For Respondents :

Mr.S.Kaithamalaikumaran

J U D G M E N T

Today, when the appeal is taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The learned counsel appearing for respondents alone appeared before this Court, through Video Conferencing.

2. On verification of records, it appears that previously, when the matter was posted on 29.04.2021 also, the counsel appearing for the appellants, had not appeared before this Court and thus, the appeal is listed today, under the caption, 'for dismissal'.

3. Hence, in view of the above, the instant Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No Costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ars To

1. The Sub Judge, Dharapuram.

2. The District Munsif, Dharapuram.

S.A.No.1077 of 2011 SRII(CO) LS(22/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/